View Post [edit]
Poster: | ihtoit | Date: | Oct 9, 2012 7:24pm |
Forum: | petabox | Subject: | Design update? |
Power supplies: In each case, a 500W ATX PSU would be powering the motherboard and system drive, and all the fans. You'd probably need half a dozen 120mm fans per case, no more. The 1kW PSU would only run at anywhere approaching full load on startup, and that would be spinning up 45 storage drives prior to booting the server. After that, the load would drop to something more sensible. Also bear in mind that most of the power drain on a hard drive is through the +5V rail.
The drives themselves would be connected via port replicators to PCIe SATA cards (45/5 gives you the requirement, which is 9 cables, 9 ports, which can be done with 2x4-port and 1x2-port cards), there configured via JBOD or RAIDx. I reckon each server could be built for less than US$7,000. EACH PB rack could be done for change out of US$100k (not including switchgear). I've had quotes myself for such a project using "Enterprise grade" hardware and seen seven to eight digits. Amazon want nearly three million bucks per rack!
Reply [edit]
Poster: | Coderjo | Date: | Oct 10, 2012 11:10pm |
Forum: | petabox | Subject: | Re: Design update? |
Reply [edit]
Poster: | GridEngine | Date: | Dec 24, 2012 10:00am |
Forum: | petabox | Subject: | Re: Design update? |
If pricing is a major concern, then Amazon RRS is cheaper, but only keeps copies of your data in 2 different datacenters. There is also Amazon Glacier that offers a much cheaper pricing but it is a bit more difficult to get your data out from Glacier.
BTW, I don't think Internet Archive should move to AWS.
Note: I don't work for Amazon, but we use AWS for our scalability testing:
http://blogs.scalablelogic.com/2012/11/running-10000-node-grid-engine-cluster.html
Rayson
==================================================
Open Grid Scheduler - The Official Open Source Grid Engine
http://gridscheduler.sourceforge.net/